Page 3 of 3

Re: Beans vs No beans?

Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 7:31 pm
by nascarchuck
ChileFarmer wrote:Yeah, but Chuck we all know your just weird. CF :mrgreen:


Thats besides the point! :ddumb:

Re: Beans vs No beans?

Posted: Tue Nov 09, 2010 12:53 pm
by Grillatarian
"You can always put chili in your beans....but you can never put beans in your chili."
Wick Fowler

I like it both ways....but I never cook with beans in mine. My wife takes my chili and pours it over rice....which is an acquired taste.

Re: Beans vs No beans?

Posted: Sun May 20, 2018 12:12 am
by Chili Billy
Once you add beans its no longer chili, after that you have spicy beef stew.
Good rule of thumb:
There is a special level of heck reserved for child abusers, people who talk in the theater and people that put beans in chili

Re: Beans vs No beans?

Posted: Sun May 20, 2018 9:37 pm
by david brace
Beans in chili -YES. Otherwise, it's just meat soup. :dont:

I use black beans in my chili.

Re: Beans vs No beans?

Posted: Sun Jun 24, 2018 9:32 am
by BigThicketBBQ
I don't really understand the fanatical insistence that beans don't belong in Chili. Growing up in West LA and East TX, most Chili had beans in it. That's what I'm most comfortable with. Moving around and trying Chili in other parts of Texas, I grew to love both styles. As long as it tastes good, who cares?